In the preceding post we have noticed how contemporary Italian literature and cinema seldom offer wide-fresco works – they perceive the single tree more than the entire forest (read a conversation on this topic.)
While we are searching for an answer in some recent Sicilian novels, we can make a guess. Sicily, like a warm-fleshed woman lying languidly on the sea, was disputed by Greeks and Phoenicians, Spartans and Athenians, Romans and Carthaginians, and later Normans Arabs popes & emperors. Such splendid (and tormented) history might have favoured a depth, a wider look in its people and writers that the Italian (or Tuscan) literature has experienced only in its best moments.
Tomasi di Lampedusa narrates how, soon after Italy’s unification, the honest Piedmont’s official Chevalley [Piedmont, at that time an advanced region, unified Italy in 1861] was sent to implore the Sicilian Prince of Lampedusa [the author's great-grandfather and protagonist of the novel, ] to represent Sicily in the new Italian Senate, “in order to remedy the state of material poverty, of blind and moral misery in which the Sicilian people find themselves, your own people!”
The Prince, smiling and inviting Chevalley to sit down with him on the couch for a while, answered with the same words he had used with some English who, before Giuseppe Garibaldi conquered Palermo, were asking what all these Northern Italians, these Garibaldini, were doing in the South of Italy.
“They are coming to teach us good manners – said to them the Prince in English – but they won’t succeed, because we are gods.“
Then at the end (with poor, decent Chevalley in total dismay because of the Prince’s denial) the aristocrat adds that in Sicily things have not changed and will never change for that ‘sense of superiority that glitters in the eye of every Sicilian, that we ourselves call pride (fierezza,) but which actually is just blindness.’
An enlightening, though gloomy, reflection.
Note. This ‘pride which actually is just blindness’ can be said of all great civilizations on earth that were. If we are worth for what we were, we are much much worthier for what we are.
Past greatness can be a richness, and a consolation, but it is not enough.