Written on Sunday 26th February 2006, at the end of a badly started (and badly continued) week.
“Anxiety, work pressure, events, thoughts and readings with no clear direction, solipsism, seeing our flaws in the mirror of those we love and, last but not least, the uneasiness of moving about a city with this gloomy indistinct threat hanging over [Al Qaeda’s menaces to the Vatican were recent at the time of this writing].”
“Woke up early and watched ‘A talking picture’ on TV (Um Filme Falado, 2003), written and directed by the Portuguese 96-years-old director Manoel de Oliveira. Joana and her mother Rosa Maria (Leonor Silveira), teaching history at a university in Lisbon, embark on a cruise ship directed to Bombay to meet Rosa Maria’s husband, an airline pilot. Now and then a new woman joins the cruise, both famous and lonely: Catherine Deneuve (a French businesswoman), Stefania Sandrelli (an Italian ex-supermodel) and Irene Papas (a Greek singer and actress). The ship captain (the US actor John Malkovich) gallantly invites the three divas to dine at his table. Later Joana and Rosa Maria are also invited and the whole cast of actors (and bunch of characters) is now together.”
“Surreal in this movie is the fact that every character speaks in his/her own language: Portuguese and English the captain plus mother and daughter; Greek, French and Italian the three divas. All of them though perfectly understand each other. This weird language thing, while making the movie hard for the masses, gives life to a fascinating cosmopolitan symposium, the various languages contributing to this effect. We better understand the title of the movie (A talking picture) since here in fact deep and disillusioned dialogues on the Western civilization unfold (its origins, meaning and future) like in a dialectic multilingual book, while the cruise ship slowly crosses the Mediterranean surrounded by some of its most ancient (and fascinating) cities: Marseille, Athens, Naples, Constantinople (Istanbul) etc., not without a last-days-of-Pompeii touch.”
“Joana and her mother had often gone down to visit various places. Once, stopping for a while at a mosque in Istanbul, I believe, Joana asks her mother whether Catholics and Muslims were still at war. “No – replies Rosa Maria – this happened in the Middle Ages” (a newspaper headline I think places the action of the movie in July 2001…a little before the Twin-towers attack)”. Here below you can see Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, taken from the Wikimedia Commons, GNU Free Documentation License.
“That same night of the fine multilingual conversation, the captain informs the crew that two time bombs placed by terrorists are about to explode in the ship. Confusion ensues and the passengers are requested to evacuate the ship in all hurry. Maria however realizing that her daughter is still on board gets back there and finally finding her the two women try to get down on a lifeboat, but all lifeboats are far and gone. The captain sees them on deck from a lifeboat and yells for them to jump, but the two women disappear in the explosion – they being so beautiful, the image of life itself -, a blast we only see as bright light reflected on the aghast face of the captain, while the credits flow down….”
“That same night, some hours before the bombs, the Greek singer (Irene Papas) had chanted an inspired sad melody lamenting how the Greek civilization had been swept away …
as the flowers of the orange tree
swept away by the cold north wind …”
“…a clear metaphor of our own Western world that could be swept away. Well, swept away seems such a stupidity to me, although signals are clear that the world balance is rapidly changing.”
“(Foreseeing this entire world balance change, what Bush (and Blair) after all meant to do but simply try to better position their chess pieces on the geopolitical chessboard, with the aim of delaying the entire Western decline (but finally – and foolishly – screwing it all up, the process having thus been probably accelerated instead)? In this sense this marvellous movie seems even more appropriate to me).”
“Beautiful, minimalistic, despite some rigidity which nonetheless is part of its charm. And, incredible to say, written and directed by a man in his mid-90s, who was born when Franklin D. Roosevelt was at the White House!”
Italian version
PS
This Roosevelt idea – plus the title of the post – I took from this excellent review by W. Addiego, San Francisco Chronicle, who wrote: “the film is stripped down in a way only mature artists can achieve … Though it may resemble an extremely austere travelogue, A Talking Picture is much more. Behind the deceptive air of artlessness, it offers a cutting portrait of civilization — our civilization — and its discontents.”



I’d love to see that film.
This post of yours was a beauty. I have frankly nothing to say…
@Ashish
Thank you, but since we now are friends I cannot trust your praises ah ah ah.
It was written in one of those moments of pessimism. I got up so early that Sunday morning, 26th February 2006 – I had probably nightmares lol – but was lucky enough to stumble upon this little jewel movie. Though it is a hard-to-follow movie being multilingual (with subtitles). Remember also that many young people’s comments on it were negative (both in Europe and America). They basically said something that depressed me and made me jump on my chair when I read them:
“Hey, this is not entertainment, this is culture! Gosh! Why this Portuguese guy didn’t just write a book, instead?”. Now ALL must be entertaining (!) in the West, or it is ignored. I think Hollywood had a lot of bad influence on young generations. This is why Anglo-Saxons and the nations they produced lack depth in the end, money and commerce being the only thing they really care about … Where is great American Cinema gone for Gods-sake?
“Hey, this is not entertainment, this is culture! Gosh! Why this Portuguese guy just didn’t write a book, instead?”. Now ALL must be entertaining in the West, or it is ignored. I think Hollywood had a lot of bad influence on young generations.
Haha yeah. This isn’t culture, this is poetry on celluloid. All people want is something to laugh at, or dance to. Nobody wants to discover something new. Like for Musicians who write songs with deep meanings are often derided because their songs don’t have the “beats” that hiphop does.
Where is great American Cinema gone for Gods-sake?
lol. One of the more recent [nearly a decade old] films – Saving Private Ryan was superb. It not only depicted the war but the effects it had. Another recent one I had seen was a Paul Haggis film [a low budget]. Don’t remember the name, but it depicted the cultural tensions in LA. These movies are movies. Yeah sometimes some fun is okay, but more and more hollywood studios are pushing their films in this direction to make money. Money rules humans, not the other way round. The ruin of all.
Jurassic Park?
@Man of Roma
>>“Hey, this is not entertainment, this is culture! Gosh! Why this Portuguese guy just didn’t write a book, instead?”. Now ALL must be entertaining in the West, or it is ignored. I think Hollywood had a lot of bad influence on young generations.
No may be the Potuguese guy expected the whole world to be blown up and not only a plane.. if hollywood has nothin’ else to think they return to their favourite theme ofdestruction of the whole world…
And a plane is way below their expectation…
On second thoughts may be the movie musn’t have been a great watch… but your narration style is so good that U can convince anyone and I mean anyone to go to hell so much that he actually looks forward for the trip…
@Falcon
You are shooting so many comments I find it hard to reply as I would … Thanks for your appreciation, anyway, and pls do not stop
[...] (quote from here). [...]